Common Sense Education Paused Its EdTech Reviews. Here Is What Teachers Should Use Instead.

5 min read

If you have ever searched for a tool review before buying a classroom subscription, you probably landed on Common Sense Education. Their five-star ratings and detailed breakdowns were a go-to for teachers, instructional coaches, and district buyers for over a decade. That resource just went quiet. Common Sense has paused its widely used edtech review program to redirect its team toward AI risk assessments, and existing review pages are no longer being updated.

Here is what that means for you and what to do about it.

What Happened to Common Sense EdTech Reviews?

As of February 2026, Common Sense Education has paused its edtech review program. The organization confirmed it is shifting resources toward evaluating AI-specific risks in education tools, a decision that reflects how quickly AI has reshaped the tools teachers are being asked to adopt. AI-powered tools are arriving in classrooms faster than any existing review framework can track, and the questions they raise, around data collection, algorithmic bias, and age-appropriate content generation, require dedicated attention. For more insights, see Technology Can Be Used for Good: A Framework for Intentional EdTech.

The review pages still exist online, but they are frozen. No new tools are being evaluated, and no existing reviews are being updated. That matters because edtech products change constantly. A review written in 2024 may describe a tool that has since overhauled its pricing, redesigned its interface, or added AI features that did not exist at the time of evaluation. Some products have changed their data privacy terms quietly, without any announcement, and now operate under different ownership with different policies than what the original review assessed.

If you are still referencing those ratings when making purchasing decisions, you are working with outdated information.

Why This Gap Matters?

Common Sense reviews were embedded in the decision-making process at thousands of schools. Teachers used them to justify tool requests to administrators. Instructional coaches referenced them in professional development sessions. District technology committees treated those ratings as a vetted shortlist that narrowed options before anyone had to dig through vendor documentation on their own. For more insights, see Free AI & Cybersecurity PD for High School Teachers (IBM).

Losing a single, trusted clearinghouse creates a real problem for an already time-constrained profession. Evaluating an edtech product properly takes time most teachers simply do not have. You have to examine data privacy policies, look for evidence of actual learning impact, assess accessibility for students with disabilities, and parse pricing structures that often hide what you are really paying after the free trial ends. Common Sense did that work and condensed it into something a teacher could act on in two minutes. For more insights, see When Students Turn to AI Instead of Parents (What Teachers See).

The gap is real. But there are better options than guessing.

Where to Find Reliable Reviews Now?

Tech and Learning has pointed to the ISTE+ASCD EdTech Index as the leading alternative. It works differently from Common Sense, so expect a short adjustment period. Rather than assigning a single score to each tool, the EdTech Index uses a validation badge system. Tools earn specific badges when they meet defined criteria in areas like research-backed design, data privacy compliance, and accessibility standards. That structure is more practical for school-level decisions than a star rating, because it lets you filter based on what matters most in your specific context. A special education teacher needs to weight accessibility differently than a district coordinator focused on data compliance, and the badge system reflects that kind of nuance. For more insights, see AI Tools for Special Education Teachers: A Practical Guide.

A few other resources are worth adding to your regular rotation. The Student Data Privacy Consortium (SDPC) Registry tracks which vendors have signed student data privacy agreements with participating states and districts. If a tool you are considering is not listed there, that is a prompt to ask pointed questions before moving forward. The What Works Clearinghouse, maintained by the U.S. Department of Education, provides evidence-based evaluations of educational programs and tools. It is more academic in format, but it is the most credible source available for asking whether a tool actually produces measurable learning outcomes. Many districts also maintain their own approved technology lists. Asking your technology coordinator directly is often the fastest path to a vetted starting point. For real-world classroom feedback, teacher communities on ISTE forums and subject-specific groups offer perspectives from educators who have used tools through full semesters, not just initial pilots.

How to Evaluate EdTech Tools on Your Own

With Common Sense no longer doing the initial screening, building a short personal evaluation habit is the most practical response. Five questions can cover most of what you need to know before committing to anything.

Start with data: what student information does this tool collect, and where does it go? Check the privacy policy. If it is hard to find or written in language no reasonable teacher could parse, treat that as a signal about how much the vendor values transparency. Second, ask whether this tool solves a problem you actually have. Strong edtech adoption starts from a specific classroom need, not a feature list that sounded impressive at a conference. Third, consider what happens to student work if you cancel the subscription. Data portability matters more than most teachers anticipate until the moment it suddenly becomes urgent. Fourth, run a real classroom test before committing any budget. A free trial in your actual room with your actual students tells you far more than a vendor demo ever could. Fifth, find teachers who have used the tool through at least one full semester. Enthusiasm at launch is easy. Honest feedback takes time to surface.

Moving Forward Without Common Sense

Common Sense Education built something teachers relied on for years, and the pause leaves a real hole. But the instinct that sent you to their site in the first place was always the right one: doing the homework before committing your students and your budget to an unfamiliar tool. The resources above give you a new starting point. The five questions give you a process. Your judgment, grounded in what your classroom actually needs, is still the most reliable filter available.

RazaEd: Free Teacher Tools

AI tools that handle the prep so you can focus on teaching. Generate differentiated reading passages, vocabulary activities, comprehension questions, writing prompts, morning warmups, and more. Free for K-5 teachers.

Explore free tools →

EdTech Institute